Ah well. I've also had a powerful urge to read a bunch more PK Dick (after re-reading High Castle recently) and Samuel Delany. Maybe that's the urge to indulge.
I've never read the first nor felt any lack from this. The second is really good. So is the fourth, which I read first, and which stood alone just fine. I'm not sure what I think of the third. I liked the fifth, more or less, though I have issues with not the ending per se, but the way it's presented. There was a lot I liked about the sixth -- but that's also where I decided to get off. It wasn't just the power escalation. It was the B-plot, where Harry decides to get proactive so the author can have a B-plot, but at the end, accomplishes nothing. Oh, but, fans assure me, it is set up for book 7. In that case, I contend, it should be in book 7.
So, why are you thinking of reading them? I don't think there's anything especially new there, from your point of view.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Ah well. I've also had a powerful urge to read a bunch more PK Dick (after re-reading High Castle recently) and Samuel Delany. Maybe that's the urge to indulge.
no subject
The second is really good. So is the fourth, which I read first, and which stood alone just fine.
I'm not sure what I think of the third. I liked the fifth, more or less, though I have issues with not the ending per se, but the way it's presented.
There was a lot I liked about the sixth -- but that's also where I decided to get off. It wasn't just the power escalation. It was the B-plot, where Harry decides to get proactive so the author can have a B-plot, but at the end, accomplishes nothing. Oh, but, fans assure me, it is set up for book 7. In that case, I contend, it should be in book 7.
So, why are you thinking of reading them? I don't think there's anything especially new there, from your point of view.