Bible knowledge quiz

[avram]

You know the Bible 87%!

 

Wow! You are awesome! You are a true Biblical scholar, not just a hearer but a personal reader! The books, the characters, the events, the verses - you know it all! You are fantastic!

Ultimate Bible Quiz
Create MySpace Quizzes

I'd have done better if there'd been fewer New Testament questions.

Comments

[kathrynt.livejournal.com]

I knew it 80%. Easily 75 of those percent are from singing.

[avram]

And one or two of them were wrong. Like, "After how many days did Jesus rise?", and "two" wasn't even an option.

[starmalachite.livejournal.com]

Technically, you're right. But Christians are taught that Jesus rose "on the 3rd day," counting the crucifixion as day 1.

98% here.

[mcroft.livejournal.com]

I hit 95%

I went back and changed the last answer (to the question "do you read the bible?") from "No" to "Some lie designed to please the quiz author" and I got 96%.

Sooooo, I've gotta say it's not 100% Bible knowledge based.

[mcroft.livejournal.com]

Also, I think there's some ten commandment numbering issues involving differences between how Catholics count 'em and how protestants do. As it seemed like an angel pinhead issue, I promptly forgot the details. It may (or may not) affect one of the questions.

[stormsweeper.livejournal.com]

The questions structures show the quiz author to only have a superficial knowledge of the bible. Like the question about which one was a book of poetry.

[avram]

Yes, which is why they should have used the traditional phrasing, like "On which day did Jesus rise?". That would have been fine. But to say that Jesus rose "after" three days is just wrong.

[avram]

I want to see the results correlated with the answers to the last question across all takers. I bet a lot of the highest scorers answered "no" to that last question.

[womzilla.livejournal.com]

QED: I got 100% though I answered "No" to "Do you read the Bible?"

Actually, I do, though it has been a while. I mostly read Bible commentary.

[jonbaker.livejournal.com]

Rabbinic Judaism since antiquity has used similar expressions for passage of time. E.g., say you have two changes of king in one year. King One rules from January to February, King Two rules from February to November, King Three rules from November onwards. The same year is Year One for King One, Year One for King Two, and Year One for King Three. The next January (actually Tishrei, but why confuse everyone) starts Year Two for King Three, even though chronologically, he's still in his first year of reign.

Similarly, shiva, which is 7 days starting from the funeral, is not 168 hours. The day of the funeral is Day One, say, Tuesday at noon. Shiva starts then. So the shiva is over the following Monday, in the morning, because "part of the day is like a whole day". The shiva may only have lasted 140 hours, but it's into the seventh day, counting from the first, not the zeroth, day.

I don't know when the concept of zero started, but it certainly was after rabbinic (late Roman) antiquity.

P.S. I got 100%. The NT questions were pretty easy, and/or guessable by eliminating one or more alternatives.