avram: (Default)

With LiveJournal’s new owners announcing that LJ will no longer allow the creation of new Basic accounts, lots of people are upset over the prospect of having to look at ads. For those of you lagging behind the leading edge of web browser technology, here’s a solution:

Step 1: Firefox if a free open-source web browser available for Windows, MacOS X, and Linux. (If you use Linux, you already know all about it, so just skip right on to some other post.) Download and install it. It’s free. Costs no money. Since it’s open-source, it’s highly customizable with lots of themes and add-ons, which brings us to…

Step 2: AdBlock is a free add-on for Firefox that allows you to block ads from showing up when you browse the web.

Special for Mac users: If you don’t want to leave Safari, you can still block ads! SafariBlock is a Safari add-on based on AdBlock. Or try Ad Subtract, which uses CSS to hide ads.

Another reason to use browser extensions: Y’know how when a LiveJournal post gets a lot of comments, LJ starts hiding some of them, and you need to keep clicking to unfold the hidden comments? Doesn’t that annoy the crap out of you? Here’s what you do:

Now those long comment pages will get an “Unfold All” link at the top of the comments. Click that, and it all unfolds. (In my experience, this doesn’t work perfectly — a few comments stay folded — but it works pretty well.)

Gym

Jan. 14th, 2008 07:51 pm
avram: (Default)
Workout numbers )

Also walked up seven damn flights of stairs, because the elevator was acting funny on the ground floor. Of course, by the time I got to the gym on the 7th floor, it had fixed itself and beaten me there.
avram: (Default)

84% Mike Gravel
79% Dennis Kucinich
78% Bill Richardson
74% Barack Obama
74% Chris Dodd
71% John Edwards
70% Hillary Clinton
68% Joe Biden
43% Ron Paul
40% John McCain
39% Rudy Giuliani
35% Mike Huckabee
31% Mitt Romney
25% Tom Tancredo
24% Fred Thompson

2008 Presidential Candidate Matching Quiz

(via [livejournal.com profile] supergee)

My biggest complaint is that Giuliani comes in above last place.
avram: (Default)
Free IQ Test Score

(via [livejournal.com profile] mylescorcoran)

A few warnings about this one: First, they demand your email address to send you the results, rather than just giving them to you. And they do this after you've taken the test, so you've already committed time and emotional energy to it. I added "+iq" to my email name, so I'd be easily able to block anything further that comes in with that address.

(Y'all know about that trick, right? Most decent email servers are set up so that if your address is, say name@example.com, you can add a plus sign and any arbitrary string of letters and numbers after the name part and it'll still go through. Say, name+iq@example.com.)

Second, they ask for your name, address, and phone number, and they do some sanity-checking on the info so you can't just make up any old nonsense. I gave them a fake name, my old Jersey City address, and a fake phone number (with a legitimate Jersey City area code).

Third, they then ask for even more identifying info, like your mother's maiden name. Screw that shit. I didn't even fill out that form. By then they had already emailed me my results link.

Fourth, the code they give you for posting to your blog includes a 0-by-0 pixel image at the end with a complicated filename that's probably used for some kind of tracking. I clipped that out before pasting it into this post.

So really, it's both a test of your IQ and a test of your ability to avoid getting your personal info snarfed.

Update: And when you close that third form without filling it out, they give you a pop-up JavaScript window tempting you with a "free gift"! Man, these people are sleazy. I feel like it might have even been a bad idea to log into gMail while I still had one of the post-quiz form pages open in another tab. I just checked, and no dangerous filters have been created in my gMail account, but still.

There, I've yanked the links from around that image. If you want to take that IQ test, you'll have to type the URL by hand, and they won't be getting any google-juice from me.
avram: (Default)
Via [livejournal.com profile] jimhenley, here's the table of contents of Green Ronin's book Hobby Games: The 100 Best. Titles I own (or have owned) are in bold, titles I've played are in italic, titles I've both are both:

Big long list )
avram: (Default)

It’s been a few months since I posted about new games at Games Club. I think we fell into a habit of playing mostly old games for a while, and then bugsybanana and I skipped going for most of this summer’s exile period. But now, here, some games that were new, or at least new to me, from this semester:

Maharaja
I barely remember this now; we played it back in September. It involves moving around a board building palaces, with money generated at the end of each turn based on what you’ve got in a particular city, and it costs money not just to build houses and palaces but also to move your architect token around the board. First player with seven palaces wins. Challenging, but we haven’t played it again since.

Clans
A pretty simple movement-based game. I’ve played it a couple of times now, and while it’s not great, it’s pretty simple and doesn’t take long to play.

Arkadia
I’ve played this twice, and both times came in second one point behind mnemex. It’s a pretty good game based on construction, worker placement, and earning colored seals which have varying values. One of the challenges is that you have only five opportunities to cash in your seals for victory points, and you get to choose when four of those happen (the fifth is at the end of the game), and have to time them for when the seals you have are at maximum value. But those cash-in phases are also the only way to get the workers you need to earn more seals….

Race for the Galaxy
Race for the Galaxy is a new game (just shipped a couple of weeks ago) based on the original design for San Juan, and incorporating more elements from the parent game, Puerto Rico, like exchanging goods for victory points. It’s about as complicated as Puerto Rico, though it seems more intimidating because of the variety of strange little icons on the cards, but it plays faster. We played it four times in five hours last night, and that included learning the rules and explaining them twice.

Like San Juan, it’s plays pretty quicly and is easy to set up. Like Puerto Rico, it supports more strategies — not just a shipping strategy, but multiple build strategies. Because play within a phase is simultaneous, you’re not screwed if the player to your right is following the same strategy you are, as you are in Puerto Rico.

I’ve got one big complaint about the card design: The card titles are printed in black, on top of a dark gray gradient. But the title is the least important part of the card, so it’s not that big a problem.

Update: One of the developers posted a “periodic table” of the cards. (That’s the large version. You need to be a member of BoardGameGeek to get at the super-large version.) A few observations:

  • Military worlds make up a bit more than a third of the total set of world cards (23 military to 41 non-military). It didn’t feel that way when I started with New Sparta, tried to follow a military strategy, and only drew two meager little military worlds all game.
  • There are more blue production worlds, and fewer blue windfall worlds, than any other color:
    • Blue: 9 production, 5 windfall (14 total)
    • Brown: 5 production, 7 windfall (12 total)
    • Green: 4 production, 7 windfall (11 total)
    • Yellow: 2 production, 6 windfall (8 total)
  • Also, blue and brown have a smaller proportion of military worlds.
  • And there are 17 uncolored worlds.
  • There are 12 6-cost development cards, out of 31 development cards in the deck, but that doesn’t count duplicates.
  • There are 14 cards that increase military strength.

(Earlier posts about boardgames.)

Fennel?

Dec. 1st, 2007 03:58 pm
avram: (Default)

Your Score: Fennel

You scored 25% intoxication, 25% hotness, 75% complexity, and 25% craziness!

You are Fennel!

You're a cool cat. Crisp, clean, fresh, and extremely complicated. You're like quantum physics or modern jazz. Think Niels Bohr meets Ornette Coleman. You may look normal now, but once you sprout, you look kind of, uh, funny.

Link: The Which Spice Are You Test written by jodiesattva on OkCupid Free Online Dating, home of the The Dating Persona Test
avram: (Default)

You may have noticed some LJ posts turning up behind LJ cuts with “Adult Content” warnings. Whether you’re an adult or not, here’s how to get that to stop happening:

  1. Go to your Edit Profile page. Fill in the Birthday data. Keep in mind that:
    1. You don’t have to use your real birthday. Make sure to use a year that makes you more than 18 years old.
    2. There’s a Birthday display options menu that lets you decide who (if anybody) can see your birthday, and how much they can see. I’ve got mine set to display only the month and day, and that only to people I’ve friended.
  2. Remember to scroll down to the bottom of the page and hit Save Changes!
  3. Go to your Viewing Options page. Scroll down to the bottom, and set the Viewing Adult Content menu to Do Not Collapse. If you haven’t already set your birthday, that option will be grayed out. Oh, and while you’re at it, you may want to reset your Safe Search Filtering preferences, which Six Apart has set to “Use moderate filtering” for you, without asking you or notifying you.
  4. Remember to Save Changes!

Hughcasey has more about LJ’s new content-filtering feature.

avram: (Default)
[livejournal.com profile] bugsybanana found this colonizing our fridge. "It's like Palm Sunday!"


Great sproutin' onion!
Originally uploaded by Avram Grumer

avram: (Default)

Just watched the first season of Heroes. Some thoughts:

Bulleted list behind cut -- could be spoilers, maybe )

In general, far too much of the plot is driven by the fact that the most powerful good guy is a moron. Still, I like most of the other characters.

avram: (Default)

Has anyone else considered this?

LionDzur
Lamb???
Polar bearTsalmoth?
Walrus???
Salt marsh harvest mouseTeckla
Wildebeest???
Ant???
Worm-eating fernbirdHawk? Phoenix? Athyra?
Sea otterOrca?
Giant anacondaDragon? Yendi?
Kangaroo???
Sort of a cross between a frilled
lizard and a common house cat
Tiassa
Wild dingo???
EmuIssola?
Tapir???
FrogJhegaala
Golden retrieverLyorn

Here, some context for people too young to remember the first season of Saturday Night Live. (Scroll down to the third comment.) He names seventeen animals!

avram: (Default)

Last night my subconscious made contact with an alternative timeline where Robert Heinlein was a scriptwriter for I Love Lucy, and pulled an episode through. Sadly, I retained pretty much nothing of it on waking.

Today, Jeffrey Rowland suggests that you can tell everything there is to know about someone by looking at their last five Wikipedia searches. Of course I looked to see what mine were:

The coffee-related searches were inspired by today’s Questionable Content. If I’d read Overcompensating before QC today, here’s what my last five would have been:

Just as well Rowland didn’t run that strip yesterday, when I was looking up euphemisms for genitalia.

avram: (Default)
I’ve been drawing again. Wow, I’m so rusty. I still don't really have a good place to set up my scanner, so it took my a while to get around to scanning this stuff.

First up, a sketch I took at the Chile Pepper Festival at the Brooklyn Botanic Garden a couple weeks back. I sat in the pavilion at the Japanese pond and sketched the spirit gateway:
Spirit gate

Yesterday I stopped off at Bryant Park and sketched one of the Art Nouveau-style streetlamps:
This one's pretty tall, so it's cut )
That lightly-sketched area in the background? This intersection, from a different angle. I missed the serious action, but I did get to see them knock some windows out.
avram: (Default)

This is a list of the 106 books most often noted as unread by users of Library Thing. Bold for books you’ve read, italics for books you’ve started but haven’t finished, strikethrough for books you found unreadable. Via [livejournal.com profile] camwyn.

The list! )
avram: (Default)

The careers meme, ganked from [livejournal.com profile] solarbird:

  1. Go to www.careercruising.com
  2. Put in Username: nycareers, Password: landmark.
  3. Take their “Career Matchmaker” questions.
  4. Post the top umpty results.

The quiz gives 40 results, but I’m cutting it off after 20:

  1. Multimedia Developer
  2. Website Designer
  3. Industrial Designer
  4. Technical Writer
  5. Computer Programmer
  6. Desktop Publisher
  7. Interior Designer
  8. Cartoonist / Comic Illustrator
  9. Drafter
  10. Fashion Designer
  11. Model Maker
  12. Animator
  13. Computer Engineer
  14. Video Game Developer
  15. Exhibit Designer
  16. Business Systems Analyst
  17. Computer Animator
  18. Graphic Designer
  19. Artist
  20. Writer

Not bad. Eight out of the first ten, and 14 out of the 20, are things I’ve done professionally, or as hobbies, or majored in at school, or done as part of another job but done well.

avram: (Default)

Here’s a tip for anybody who uses Faber-Castell PITT pens: After the tip gets all worn and frayed, you can pluck it out with tweezers, spin it around, and put it back in backwards. There’s a second tip on the other end! Make sure not to spill the ink out of the marker’s body while you’re doing this. Here’s a YouTube video of the process, from Adam “Ape Lad” Koford.

avram: (Default)
You know the Bible 87%!
 

Wow! You are awesome! You are a true Biblical scholar, not just a hearer but a personal reader! The books, the characters, the events, the verses - you know it all! You are fantastic!

Ultimate Bible Quiz
Create MySpace Quizzes

I'd have done better if there'd been fewer New Testament questions.

avram: (Default)

A few weeks back, when I was going through my books looking for stuff to toss out, I found some old copies of this British kid’s fantasy series — Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, etc. And I was wondering, what ever happened with that? Did it ever get finished?

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags