After the play, my folks drove us over to my place, and Chris and I hung out for a while then saw the second X-Men movie. I liked this more than the first, mostly because it just felt more like an X-Men story than the first one did. More superhero action, more interaction with the traditional X-Men backstory, more actual characters from the comic. More behind the spoiler warning....
- Damn, that opening Nightcrawler action sequence kicked ass.
- Nice shots of Kitty and Colossus during the raid.
- Every time Jean pushed her powers and we saw flames in her eyes, I could see the plot of the next movie being set up.
- They did a good job of giving all the major characters cool stuff to do.
- The ambiguous sometimes-ally, sometimes-enemy nature of the relationships among the mutant groups was well-handled. (Mark Millar does a good job with this in the Ultimate X-Men comic, too.)
- I didn’t much like how Jean “died”; if she could fix the plane with her mind, why couldn’t she do it while staying on the plane? If she was powerful enough to split the water, shouldn’t she have been able to just levitate the plane with herself on it?
- Did you notice that very faint outline of the Phoenix symbol on the water at the very end?
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-05 03:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-05 05:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-05 06:31 am (UTC)Of course, Phoenix generally entails Hellfire Club, which is never bad.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-05 07:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-05 09:35 am (UTC)Are Rogue and Iceman dating in any of the x-books? I just read Ultimate X-Men and Grant Morrison's New X-Men, and I don't think Rogue has shown up in either of them.
I'm wrong!
Date: 2003-05-05 12:29 pm (UTC)Nightcrawler and Romance
Date: 2003-05-06 02:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-05 09:07 am (UTC)I missed the phoenix symbol on the water, I think, though I was looking for something like; will have to see the movie again (darn! :).
I liked the fact that unlike the comic, Wolverine Killed People.
I though that Iceman was -way- underused; I know they're inverting him (along with Rogue) relative to certain other X-Men (um...Logan and Ororro are back-dated), but based on the power and control he's shown so far, it seems concievable that he could at least -try- to something about a raging river, even if they had him fail and Phoenix take over.
I also found the reasons she needed to get off the plain a bit hard to follow, though if they were trying to hint that full use of her powers was tech-disruptive, that might explain it (as well as the lack of control -- she might be able to lift the plane...but for how long? A: she doesn't know, which is a problem).
If I were setting things up, I'd make the next movie "X-Men: Phoenix", and the -fourth- "X-Men: Dark Phoenix", (especially since the full DF story includes whole organizations that haven't been introduced, like the Shiar, the Blue Region, Mastermind; even if they change things around, they seem to like keeping the scope of the X-Men stories, and it involved the destruction of -worlds-), but who knows what they're thinking?
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-05 09:31 am (UTC)And in a way, they've already introduced Mastermind -- did you notice that Stryker's son, the guy who seduces people by projecting illusions into their minds, was named Jason? Though I don't see how he could have survived the collapse of the dam without aid from some other mutant; maybe Magneto could have stealthily yanked him out.
I'm wondering if they're going to introduce the Sentinels at some point.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-05 01:06 pm (UTC)I thought it would be cool if Iceman had tried to freeze the water, succeeded for a few seconds, and then the water broke through, because there's a lot of it and he's not strong enough, and -then- Jean did her thing. Did you catch the significance of the book Magneto and the Prof are reading?
I liked how the relationships are established rapidly when Wolverine returns. Reminded me of the Powers/Rathbone Zorro, where there is a complicated love pentangle in a 90 minute movie, which is packed with action.
I liked the fact that there were casualties. Wolverine killed, and I find it hard to believe that none of the cops Pyro attacked died. That said, I am wondering if it is disingenous to have that line about casualties "on both sides" when only one mutant died, however beloved. Or were there other casualties I missed? Oh yes -- Lady Deathstrike. And one could count Stryker's victims as, well, not casualties per se, but wounded. And I think Jason's being counted as a mutant casualty, though we didn't see him die.
I do wonder why Wolverine didn't just finish Stryker off, but hey, not in front of the kid.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-05 07:54 pm (UTC)I caught the two references to Once and Future King, but I'm not sure what the intended point was. Suggestions?
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-06 11:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-06 03:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-06 03:36 pm (UTC)It must be something more than a Phoenix reference. Magneto was reading the book in his cell, when there was no reason to be thinking of Jean Grey in particular.
"The Once and Future King" by T.H. White
Date: 2003-05-09 06:57 am (UTC)Re: "The Once and Future King" by T.H. White
Date: 2003-05-09 01:53 pm (UTC)In Magneto's case, it's the title. He wants to subjugate humanity under mutantkind, and with him as the head mutant -- the future king.
In Prof. X's case, it's a reference to Arthur sleeping beneath a hill, seemingly dead, but ready to rise again at some future date. That's Phoenix. (Prof. X doesn't know this; it's a wink at the audience.)
Re: "The Once and Future King" by T.H. White
Date: 2003-05-09 07:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-11 10:04 pm (UTC)Yay! I got Colossus's name right. (My Marvel continuum knowledge is awfully, awfully spotty, though it's better than
When it ended, he sort of said, "Well," and I said, "Wasn't she Phoenix, for a while?" I may have to see it again and see if I can pick out the symbol.