OK, here’s something to be annoyed about. (We could all use more of that, right?) Thanks to
kathrynt, I looked up this MSNBC story about a recent poll on American attitudes towards gays and the freedom to marry, and then looked up the poll report itself. (This is always a good idea, if you can manage it. Newspapers often leave out important details; television always does.) On page two I found the following information:
Only 14% knew the right answer, and that’s down from 16% in 1985!
| Why are people homosexual? | 1985 | 2003 |
|---|---|---|
| Something born with | 20% | 30% |
| Way people are brought up | 22% | 14% |
| Way some prefer to live | 42% | 42% |
| Don’t know | 16% | 14% |
Only 14% knew the right answer, and that’s down from 16% in 1985!
Nitpick
Date: 2003-11-18 12:14 pm (UTC)Or, of course, sexual orientation could be multiply determined: a combination of pre- and post-natal events, for example, or different causes in different people.
The real question is "Why are they taking this poll?" Why do people think it matters: religion isn't inborn, but most of us agree that people shouldn't be discriminated against for their religious beliefs.
Hmm. I wonder what results you'd get if you took that same poll but replaced "homosexual" with "Christian"--without changing the available answers.
Re: Nitpick
Date: 2003-11-18 12:24 pm (UTC)I wonder what would happen if you swapped in the word “heterosexual”.