avram: (Default)
[personal profile] avram
I noticed this yesterday during a quick Google News scan:
The 10-member [9-11 investigation] panel had invited [National Security Adviser Condoleeza] Rice to testify. She declined, with the White House citing concerns about separation of powers.

What the fuck? Do they even bother trying to find good excuses for their cover-ups anymore? Or did they just chop the Constitution into random phrases that they draw out of a bucket? “Oh, sorry, President Bush can’t testify because, um, no person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the age of thirty years.”

Re: Not Made Up

Date: 2004-03-26 06:30 am (UTC)
ext_24631: editrix with a martini (Default)
From: [identity profile] editrx.livejournal.com
Wow, that doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Since WHEN do appointees not appear before Congressional committees? I guess you're not old enough to remember Watergate, O Anonymous One.

Cite me a law, not a custom, here. And tell me why Cabinet appointees had to appear before the very, very public Congressional committee that investigated Watergate, for example.

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags