avram: (Default)
[personal profile] avram
Ah, Wikipedia! Sure, the stuffy old guard may doubt your accuracy (though the Encyclopædia Britannica might not be any better), but how many encyclopedias have not just an entry on the umlaut, but a separate entry on the use of the umlaut in heavy metal rock band names? (“At one Mötley Crüe performance in Germany, the entire audience started chanting, ‘Moertley Crueh!’”)

Tip: Wikipedia’s search function is kinda slow. I just do a Google search, adding in “wikipedia” as a search term.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-27 10:22 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-27 11:05 pm (UTC)
ext_28681: (Default)
From: [identity profile] akirlu.livejournal.com
In a strange bit of synchronicity, or perhaps not, Mike Godwin has been addressing some criticisms of Wikipedia (http://www.godwinslaw.org/weblog/archive/2005/01/21/picky-about-wikipedia) in his weblog.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-28 01:51 am (UTC)
sdelmonte: (Default)
From: [personal profile] sdelmonte
Well, how accurate could anything be if they let me contribute? :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-01-29 12:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holyoutlaw.livejournal.com
Thanks for these links. I've been looking things up in wikipedia for my Philosophy class. I take the course of one of the respondents to the Corante posting: If I find something interesting, I find it in a more traditional source. This is only fact checking, after all.

Although as I use wikipedia more, I'm more tempted to participate in it.

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags