avram: (Default)
[personal profile] avram

Arg, no thanks to John Gruber, I spent some time this afternoon perusing Eric Raymond’s blog. No, he hasn’t gotten any better.

I was amused to see a few election-related posts — all dating from that brief period around the end of August and early September when McCain’s numbers looked good — gloating about how Obama’s campaign is doomed, doomed. Not a single election-related post later than Sep 18th, though.

Not that Raymond is a Republican, he hastens to remind us. But, like most guys in the lowbrow right-wing branch of the libertarian movement, he’s motivated primarily by ressentiment towards liberals, rather than a love of actual liberty.

(No, not all libertarians are like that. Honest, I know some good ones. The bad ones just tend to stick out more in my mind. Maybe that’s my own ressentiment towards right-wingers speaking.)

But far worse was “The Post-Racial Hall of Mirrors”, where he starts off talking about how he had to drive through a Delaware slum, and was revolted by all the black people around him. Not because of their skin color, he assures us, but because they were so fat and sloppy. How he deals with hanging out at SF cons, I dunno. He goes on to explain that he can’t possibly be a racist, because his belief that blacks have lower IQs is based on real science, and besides, he used to bang this hot black chick.

I take Raymond as a warning — that being a smart guy doesn’t keep you from being an idiot. I can easily imagine myself having turned into the same kind of idiot that he is, given different life experiences.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-10-17 06:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nancylebov.livejournal.com
Thanks, and it nicely collapses a distinction I was thinking about. I'm not sure whether Eric wants to annoy actual liberals, or to annoy the invented liberals in his head. For purposes of this discussion, it doesn't matter. And either way, it's a bad motivation.

I don't know if Eric argues for anything he thinks is false-- I'm inclined to think he doesn't. I suspect he's framing things he believes in more aggressive and insulting terms that would be needed for straight argument.

I also suspect that after enough years of taking pleasure in annoying liberals, he's drawn to bad arguments which will annoy them, like his nonsense about Palin.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-10-17 07:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nancylebov.livejournal.com
I was thinking of Read My Lipstick, not the more serious piece, which I seem to have missed.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-10-18 02:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] james-angove.livejournal.com
[Warning: Much, old USENET inside BB follows]

Annoying or not annoying liberals per-se isn't the goal. Its still a bystander effect. This was the underlying premise of the MA/PM attack on on LK on RASFF all those years ago: to indite the idea of being liberal as specifically criminal, and to assault certain kinds of past youthful efforts as self-discovery -especially those mixed the the sort of nostalgia most feel for their early adulthood - and there by indite liberalism as essentially violent. The part where they did there damnedest to make LK cry and feel personal pain was secondary, and largely about MA's need to proof that as a grown up, he's a bigger, better bully than the people he went to highschool with.

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags