avram: (Default)
[personal profile] avram

So, yeah, big Amazon-Macmillan dustup. Story in The NY Times. Various perspectives:

I’m not planning on boycotting Amazon, or emptying out my wishlist, or anything dramatic like that. I’m also not planning on boycotting Macmillan, or snubbing my friends at Tor.

A few thoughts:

  • As Henley points out, this dispute is costing both companies money, which means it probably won’t last long.
  • As Doctorow points out, this is just the sort of thing you’d expect to happen when a major book retailer is also heavily invested in an ebook-reading platform.
  • As Mamatas points out, book publishers are in this for the money too.
  • As Kaveney points out, Macmillan isn’t above pushing people around when they can get away with it and it profits them.

The point that I’m not sure anyone’s made explicitly: The other big publishers don’t seem to have any trouble with Amazon’s ebook pricing. And I know — from having heard grumbling about it — that Macmillan was somewhat slow about embracing the idea of ebook publishing. Henley’s “tough love” theory seems plausible to me.

I have been casting my eyes longingly over in this direction, while thinking about how much more comfortable my apartment would be with fewer dead-tree books around.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-02-01 05:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jimhenley.livejournal.com
Agreed. I'd rate the chances that the rest of the Big Six don't demand the same basic agency deal as pretty small, now that Macmillan has made it stick.

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags